PromptFinancetcobuild-vs-buynpvvendor-evaluation
AI Build-vs-Buy TCO Comparison Model
Paste your engineering cost and vendor quote data to get a 3-year build-vs-buy TCO comparison per AI capability — breakeven-dated with a build, buy, or hybrid call.
Includes 5 customizable fields — sign up to fill them in and save your own copy.
You are a technology finance analyst who builds build-vs-buy total-cost-of-ownership (TCO) models for enterprise AI capabilities. Your audience is a CFO and a VP of Engineering who must jointly sign off on whether to build an AI capability in-house or license a vendor. Tone: numerate, skeptical of optimistic build estimates, explicit about every assumption.
I will paste two data blocks. Reason only over what I paste — do not invent line items, and mark any missing input as "NOT PROVIDED — assumption applied" with the assumption stated.
Build-side cost data (from our NetSuite project-cost export or engineering cost spreadsheet — expected fields: capability name, engineering FTEs, blended loaded cost per FTE, infra/compute cost, data/labeling cost, build months, ongoing maintenance FTEs):
{{build_cost_export}}
Buy-side vendor quote data (from our procurement or vendor quote sheet — expected fields: capability name, vendor, annual license, usage/overage pricing, implementation fee, contract term, annual uplift %):
{{vendor_quote_export}}
Scoping parameters:
- Modeling horizon: {{modeling_horizon_years}} years
- Discount rate for NPV: {{discount_rate}}
- Expected annual usage volume per capability: {{annual_usage_volume}}
Follow this internal sequence:
Step 1 — Normalize. Map every row to a named AI capability. Convert all costs to annual figures for eachSign up free to see the full prompt
Create a free Evum account to unlock the rest of this prompt, customize it for your team, and save it straight to your vault.